| Quality management system | Current automotive quality-system certificate, certificate scope, issuing certification body, and recent audit findings or corrective-action records. | Confirm that the certificate is valid and covers the actual manufacturing site and relevant processes. IATF 16949 is an automotive quality-management-system standard; certification does not by itself prove that a specific bushing meets its drawing or performance requirements. | Treat an expired, out-of-scope, or unverifiable certificate as a qualification risk. Check current certificate status directly with the relevant certification or oversight source. |
| Product and process approval | APQP timing plan, process flow, process FMEA, control plan, measurement results, material records, and PPAP submission level agreed with the customer. | Check that documents describe the quoted part, production site, tooling, material, and process route. PPAP requirements and submission levels should be agreed with the customer; they are not a universal substitute for customer-specific approval. | Require documented approval before production shipments when the customer’s requirements call for it. Confirm change-control rules for any later process or material change. |
| Rubber and material traceability | Material specifications, batch certificates or test records, incoming inspection results, supplier-change controls, and lot-traceability examples. | Verify the specified elastomer, metal grade, coatings, bonding system, and any customer-approved alternatives. Confirm that production lots can be traced to material batches and manufacturing records. | Do not accept an unapproved material substitution based only on a generic claim of equivalent performance. |
| Dimensional and visual inspection | Inspection plan, drawing balloon report, calibrated equipment list, gauge records, capability studies where required, and samples from the intended production process. | Check critical dimensions, tolerances, datum strategy, bonded interfaces, surface condition, and acceptance criteria against the latest approved drawing and specifications. | Agree measurement methods and sample sizes before comparing results. A prototype measurement report alone may not represent production capability. |
| Mechanical and durability testing | Test plans and reports for the application’s specified load, stiffness, displacement, fatigue, temperature, and environmental conditions. | Confirm test fixtures, conditioning, sample preparation, cycle profiles, failure definitions, and acceptance limits match the customer specification. Rubber tensile and hardness methods can reference applicable ISO methods, such as ISO 37 and ISO 48-4, when appropriate to the material and requirement. | There is no single universal pass threshold for all automotive bushings; use the vehicle or component specification and document any approved deviation. |
| Laboratory competence and calibration | Laboratory scope, equipment calibration certificates, method validation records, and external laboratory accreditation details where applicable. | For outsourced testing, check whether the relevant test is within the laboratory’s ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation scope. Verify calibration traceability and that test methods are suitable for the required measurements. | Accreditation applies to a defined laboratory scope; it should not be assumed to cover every test the laboratory offers. |
| Regulatory and substance compliance | Material declarations, substance-compliance statements, supporting supplier declarations, and applicable market or customer-specific compliance records. | Identify the destination markets and applicable requirements. EU REACH and the End-of-Life Vehicles (ELV) Directive may be relevant to automotive materials and articles; applicability depends on the part, market, and supply-chain obligations. IMDS is an automotive material-data reporting system, not a regulation. | Request current, part-specific declarations and clarify responsibility for updates when materials or regulatory requirements change. |
| Process control and change management | Control-plan records, process monitoring data, maintenance schedules, nonconformance reports, corrective actions, and formal change-notification procedures. | Review controls for molding or curing, bonding, machining, assembly, and final inspection as applicable. Check how the supplier identifies out-of-control conditions and prevents affected product from shipping. | Require prior review or approval for changes to site, tooling, material, process, or sub-supplier when required by the customer’s terms. |
| Capacity and delivery continuity | Documented capacity assumptions, production schedule, lead-time definition, maintenance and contingency plans, and evidence of supply-chain risk review. | Compare demonstrated capacity with forecast demand and identify single points of failure, including critical materials, equipment, tooling, and logistics routes. | Base the decision on documented recovery arrangements and realistic capacity data, not an unsupported assurance of uninterrupted supply. |
| Commercial and technical readiness | Itemized quotation, tooling ownership and maintenance terms, packaging specification, warranty terms, engineering support contacts, and agreed performance indicators. | Check that quoted assumptions match the drawing, forecast, packaging, Incoterms, validation plan, and expected service life. Confirm how warranty claims and root-cause investigations will be handled. | Compare total lifecycle and qualification risk, not unit price alone. Record unresolved technical or commercial items before nomination. |